Visit our September 2015 Archive Web Site

 

Inve$tor Tran$parency

AB$%®

 

AbsolutePercent.com

BuyOpps.com

D30Curve.com

EarnedHours.com

GetSmartDow.com

Oibitda.com

Perfectdjia.com

ProbabilityQuotient.com

QuotientActual.com

 

Email:

info@oibitda.com

 

Address:

2160 Judge Jamieson Way

Viera, FL 32940 

 

Phone:

321-305-4997

 To change the Entire Business World & Join 

the Financial Markets with the Accounting Profession By Certifying Quarterly Operations Graphicly in Chart Form

 

All Made Probable to Change by a Quotient from Hours Paid to Employees in a Grid Format as Patented that Renders Certainity to Total Results

AND DIAGNOSE THE RESULTS AT THE SAME TIME  

The Financial Markets (Barron's) did not accept an Absolute Percent that ranks Stocks with an Hourly Benchmark with a Single Percent from .1% to 100%+, because the Absolute Percent means less trading.  Well here is another reduction of trading  

 

Tracking 30 Stock Prices 25 Days Out  

 

A Stock Price , A Currency Exchange Rate, Net Sales Dollars &

Cash Receipts for Banks & Any Business 

Have Been Given Arithmetic Certaintly in

An Accounting Sense by 100% with the same Patent that brought Investors the Absolute Percent Via the Universal Grid 

AND 100% IS NEVER WRONG   

  

   Per Share Certainty is for 25 days of trading 30 prices by the most consistent Operating Performing Corporations  known as the DJIA. Such were previously  RANKED  with a single & absolute Quarterly Operating Performing Percent (AB$%®) from a Patented Hourly Benchmark #3 that records Cash Profit ROI    

   

   I like to think about the Patent/Trademark Process technology as that of never ending  baseball statistics that can be dated back 100 years & still applicable today beginning with a 25 man roster that goes back as far I can remember.  Twenty five days of batting & earned run averages (ROI’s) dispersed among 25 players as combined daily with no rhyme or reason with results for nine innings while always keeping track of the entire roster. In fact see Tab 2 for a Baseball Average of the Past Recorded with the Future in Mind.

 

   Foremost, Amazon can not have it both ways, Cap. Value for Management versus Popularity for Shareholders. 

   Recent Price $1150 per Share with 2% Growth = $23.00

      $1150 with an imposed 12 stock split = $95.83 & 2% growth = $1.917

          Per $1000 & 100 Shares,,,,, $23.00/$1.917 = 12 Times or the non-split for Management & not shareholders.   

Which are Investors more likely to risk with a 100 share buy ???.

 

   Individual Stock Prices need periodic stock splits for the benefit of Shareholders to manage & measure change over the same period of time versus other stocks in the same Fund or Portfolio.  What portfolio management use is it; if one stock Trading @ $100  grows 3% over the last month, while another is trading at $33 does 2% over 6 weeks ?. That is what absolute trading is all about.... Always knowing if ROI is up or down for a Fund or Portfolio before making a trade because both the stock & fund use an inverted ROI for price per share for each.  

 

  All is addressed in chart 1 below where  6 individual stock variables are distinguish among 30 DJIA stocks from a single share as quantified collectively with the ROI of the Fund or Portfolio itself.  As never done before being patented. 


 Chart #1 is a "Data New" Version of the DJIA ranked with three patented variables B, C & D:

 

Col B) Closing Price per Share of a Corporation’s Public Stock

 

Col C) an Hourly Benchmark #3 for the Paid Hours of the Corporation

 

Col D) the ROI percent for the Quarterly OiBiTDA Dollars (CPA’s Cash Profit) of the same Corporation

 

Col E)  Shares per $1000 Traded and/or Invested

 

Col F)  is the Absolute Percent (AB$%®) the Single Trademark for Each Corporation with ranges from .1% to over 100% that individually ranks Each Corporation from high absolutes to the lowest with three patented variables plus the most important driver never used for the financial marekts before: the quantity of shares per $1000 invested or traded.

  

The current data for the 7 charts on this tab is from the close of business on Nov. 30 for the DJIA (+332 points @ 24,272 or $242.72 per share)  as updated each week Tuesday for Monday's close & Thursday for Wednesday close at $49.50 for each full calendar quarter.  

 

Column’s G & H Uses American Express (AXP) as its example. The Patent’s Earned versus Paid Hours component of two Patents fixes 13,000 shares with 13,000 Paid Hours for 13 week’s trading at $93.90 per share for TRADING VALUE OR $93,900  before a 25 day cycle starts as a Quotient. Therefore 13,000 / Total Trading Value  $93,900 =.13845

 

It .13845 is the Quoient Probable of AXP for 1000 Shares no matter how many are traded  for 25 Days of Trading Value or $1,223,960  the 1st line of chart 2 for AXP

 

 Moving to the Actuality of a Grid  in the 2nd chart  line 1 

AXP  closed the day at $97.70 for the day x 1000 shares = to $977,000  for line 7 of the Grid & a total of $1,223,960 / by 13,000  to = $94.15 the Prediction for the Day 

$94.15-$93.90 at the start of the Grid = $.25  &  .27% better than $93.90 the so called Prediction

 

Made Certain  by the the Quotient .13845  X  Total Trading Value $1,223,960 

to Equal Hours Earned  of the Grid Divided by the Actual Earned Hours 139451

to Equal what is 100% for Each  Statistical Certainty in the 2nd Chart 

Why trade daily among the Dow 30 when each changes randomly
Click For Details

 Proving the Arithmetic Certainty of Grid Totals with Postings of 13 weeks within the Patents 

 

Sales certanity for any Business is easy because numbers are backed by bookkeeping or accounting operating statements prepared. Using the sales of the prior quarter & knowing the percent deviation from it all during the quarter is just short of predicting, and confiirming results for accounting purposes. Attaching such sales to Payroll Paid Hours are enhanced as Patented by Gross Payroll Paid that can easily be. confirmed by the  IRS as a 3rd party with the addition of PAID HOURS as submitted.  

 

After done for the first time quarterly the data becomes routine & powerful as Quarter to Date Actual with many comparatives among Corporate Products, other businesses & competition.  Especially powerful because such data has never been gathered before over a consistent period of accounting time; a quarter.  The 13th week uses plug amounts that are in agreement with Net Sales Dollars and OiBiTDA Dollars of Operating Statements submitted to the SEC each Quarter.

 

In addition  13 week totals are reconciled to the penny for Payroll & to the Dollars  of Operating results with the prior Quarter as Patented for Benchmark #1 Sales, Benchmark #2 Payroll & Bx #3 OiBiTDA with percents  relative to 100%, Including the trading value of a stock by Paid Hours know as ROI & column D above.

 

The chart below summarizes  the AXP methodology with 100% including the DJIA by taking the Gross Trading Value of a Stock for 13000 Hours & 13000 Shares X a  Quotient & deviding by the Grid's Actual Earned Hours that equals 100% for Each so called Prediction. 

   It is hard to believe that Stock Quantities, escaped 100 years of numerical quantity impact within financial markets when super markets are required to state the price per pound & oz for comparison purposes to like products. Chart #3 below shows how Price per Share with high ROI is the path as exposed by the Absolute Percent as the most dominant factor for advantageous investment results.  In fact it is even easier than that. The ROI of a Portfolio goes up with any purchase of a higher ROI than that of the Fund or Portfolio .    

 

   The chart below will be posted each day because it represents a Wall Street concoction that tracks the worldwide financial industry for which it has no right to bare such responsibity .

  

   The daily right detail of the chart reports the 10 highest holdings (when combined over 50% most of the time) of DIA ETF SPDR, better known with a one-day lag  for the outstanding shares of the DJIA Index that has  World Wide transparency with no limitation as to how high the value can grow. I report the lagged share/units at the current day's closing price of each Dow (currently $20 trillion +)  by taking such share/units outstanding from the DIA website; times the current closing price of the Index Itself. Yes equaling plus $20 trillion (on a cloud) when all 79 billion outstanding reporrted elsewhere on this website total in the $7 trillion range. 

 

In summary for the data on the right exclusive of the 1st column only, the chart reports an Absolute Percent (AB$%) below 5% because only 2 of the 10 components are among the best 10 as ranked by the AB$% elsewhere on the website. As also calcualted  by a high price per share combined with a low Benchmark #3 as Patented.

    At the same time in the 1st column  using the same above mythology & the Patent for the 10 best AB$%® Dow Stocks Ranked (only 2 stocks are among the 10 highest DIA holdings) the calculated Absolute Percent is far beyond that of the DIA ETF due to the Patent’s higher Benchmark #3 and ROI accentuated by Shares per $1000.  

 

All collaborated by the respective AB$% for each of the 10 DIA ETF in the extreme right.

 

Frankly I offer no advice for the aggrandisement of the the DIA ETF Index with no end in sight. Perhaps a converion to Bonds with retribution  by Management by its circular reasoning with quoting the cost at 3% less (.532/18.424) for $19.956 trillion of overall value in the last annual report.

 

Market Advice, High Technology Stocks with  Transparent Speed are Rising on a Cloud while Arithmetic Technology Stocks are Appreciating  in Real Time for Direct Shareholders.       

  

I imposed a 3% decline accross the board 

in the 7 of 13 lines of the Universal Grid 

for 31 Stocks 

that collaborates TOTALS for the PATENTED GRID  for various stock prices 

from the closings of 12/15/17 on grid line 1 thru 6 & lines 8 thru 13  

All of which produced  an equal decrease of 1.62% for 28 of 30 Stocks  in the $100 range

 

 In the Chart Below

The D 30 Curve on the left is a model with 460,578 shares as allocated from 79.476 Outstanding Shares in the middle  

 

The 30 Curve Model should be an

ECONOMIC INDICATOR ON AN EVERY DAY BASIS 

Representing the 30 Most Consistent  Corporation to 

RAISE CASH PROFIT

with Benchmark #3 $57.56 Revised for Each  Quarter 

All Outstanding Shares in the middle could be the Economic Indicator also with BX#3 at $50.26

Either one could be an Advertising Bonanza 

With the $30 million Curve a Hands ON

Bank Real Time Product where as all saving depositors could Transfer into $1000 Increments of the Econimic Indicator. As each $30 million is prescribed, a Bank can finance a new one until fully funded by Saving Deposits

 

FAR BETTER THAN THE DJIA ETF INDEX CLOUD

ON THE RIGHT 

The Final 25 day Cycle of 12/15 /17

or What Have the 30 Dow Stocks Doing Lately  

The BELOW chart Continuity for Tuesday & Thursday Updating 

No number can stand alone to CHANGE with meaning unless it has both another number in reference to ,AND an element of time. 

  First, I had to prove a Grid Methodology for CHANGE above with the “MEANS” from another number AND a period of time simultaneously with several other charts & explanations.    

   I have been tracking three version of the DJIA for at least 10 years with the DIA ETF SPDR on the extreme right. The DIA ETF changes every minute of the trading trade on the NYSE. Up to the last presidential election it tracked fairly well for short periods of time changes with the left version (allocated shares) from all those outstanding. As well as the center at $6 trillion, that is the Cap Value of 30 individual Corporations calculated from their respective outstanding shares in billions for 30 Corporations subject to component replacements periodically.    

   I believe all was well for this particular DIA Exchange Trading Fund until shares exchanging from 300,000 to 500,000 (today) was the case. But when the accumulation of exchanges caught up to those outstanding shares and passed such an amount the change mythology became unreasonable with the very recent past approaching 40% change.  All the financial experts know 30 corporation cannot improve their own most recent quarterly operating performance to that degree. Let alone all 30 at the same time.

   The management of DIA ETF cannot have it both ways. They can use the Universal Grid with a fixed number of Paid Hours (13,000) that satisfies the time component of “MEANING” by dividing 13,000 by $19.956 trillion. Or they can fluctuate the 19.956 by a quantity of units that equates to $233.62 up or down per share. But they cannot report with a timing method of change to shareholders at one date in time October 31 2017 and another to the NYSE for every minute of change when unit increases can go that go up or down that is not be in harmony or sync with the overall value stock of price per share.

 

It is no wonder that a Fund cannot measure change because a stock itself does not have the two elements of change versus every other stock when trading.

 

A certificate of deposit has a start time with a dollar base in dollars & cents at the start. How can an investor exchange one stock for another when the price does not have another amount to reference (Benchmark #3) in dollars & Cents even when the same daily base.  

Benchmark #3 of an Equity Corporation as Patented separates one Stock from another & One Protfolio and/or Fund from another.

Benchmark #3 & its ROI from Trading Value as derived in Quarterly Grid Format as Patented is Driven by Sale Dollar Change versus Prior Quarter    

Below

Its is hard to say where the Patent/Trademark's Largest Market Lies for the Technology Until Benchmark #2 is Introduced 

Sales Efficiency + Laborr Efficiency as Benchmark #2 Always = to 100% when added togheter for Any Business by Design 

 

To Repeat  

When Sales are Less than 100% Efficient.... Payroll Cost are More then Earned Hour Efficient with a plus %

 

When Sales are less than 100% efficient.... Payroll Cosis are more Efficient with a minus % 

 

YES & whike the Uninversal Grid Quarter to Date Totals Produces   

The Cost in Dollars & Cents & the Efficiency of PAID HOURS of Every Operation and/or Business the World Over in the Local Currency 

 

   Below starting in week 8 is a Grid Chart meant to be used for the rental of apartmerts where there are generally weeks where no rents are collected. 

 

The Totals, The Anaylsis, The Efficiency of Labor, The Return of Investment, Nor the Predictability of Net Sales Are NOT Distoried by Quarter to Date Totals 

 

Specifically Below with Amounts 

   Within the Grid the daily Quotient Probable earns hours versus those paid among three dollar variables as Patented: Bx #1 Net Sales Income, Bx #2 Payroll Costs, & Bx #3 OiBiTDA Dollars. The three work in tandem as in the chart.

 

  Hours Earned from Sales 57,276/ 52,465 Paid Hours  = 109.2%

 

While 

Payroll Dollars = $14.940 per Paid Hour vs.

Hours Earned  $13.685 or -9.2% more     

to Always = 100%  with  Sales Efficiency as Patent Designed

 

WHILE 

Net Sales Totals, in this case Cash Receipts were intentially made very irratic in amount for the last cells of the grid while analyzed in total with the previous quarter. ($352,777 more with a volume & rate per room breakout as to price & volumn ) 

 

Such OiBiTDA Dollars from Net Sales and/or Cash Receipts as Benchmark #3 is also related to a Stock Price as analyzed versus the Prior Quarter  $35,328  more per Hour. 

 

   Hospital Operating Rooms & Patient Rooms would different Quotients from their respective different Income. Earning  Hours from their Paid Hour Personnel. Hospitals & the entire Medical Industry as the most Labor intensive I know is badly of need of any comparative industry data for Insurance Rates. 

 

Borrowing from the Patent Text & the Last Numerical Chart   

  

   "There are no wrong OiBiTDA results for a Current Quarter when the Actual Paid Hours of the Prior Quarter are divided by the Actual Sales Dollars of the Prior Q to = the Quotient Probable for the Certainty of Reporting Accounting Results. 

   

Little did I know in the 1970’s when I compared Hours Paid to those Earned so much would be derived from so little. Such was from a manufacturing cost system for a Division under my controllership.  So much, being the Quotient when divided by the Net Sales Dollars or cash receipts of the Previous Quarter.

 

Any business user need not know the exact number of Paid Hours before its first use as the numerator  All of which I speak comes into focus from that which follows weekly across all the columns that equals 100%.

 

   Subsequently posting will begin deviations with 100% while every Sale Dollar develops the facts of of net sale revenue whether cash receipts, billings or credit cards for what ever Hours Paid over 13 weeks.

 

   Soon after a user will begin to reley on his or hers own data with weekly averages in each cell versus those for prior weeks. Even 2 or 3 weeks to a current calendar quarter ended March 31, June 30, Sept. 30 & Dec. 31  or fiscal quarters for such companies will be good enough to solo for your own business for your own yearly quarter.

 

   Eventually your Quotient data & the deviations in totals will be managing your CASH IN. With this in hand along with weekly postings of the weekly net changes to one or several checking accounts in the OiBiTDA column you will have your cash profit from operations along with the analysis of the 3 Patented Benckmarks. 

 

  I am saying that TOTAL NET SALES DOLLARS are independent of the initial numerator and/or denominator amounts in the chart as noted by white on black cells. All Net Sales dollar postings subject all other Total Columns to change via the multiplication of the Quotient. 

 

  If the user of the Grid prepares a Quarter to Date operating statement for the exact days of the grid which is recommended, the net sales of week 13 would be adjusted to have the total sales agree with the statement that would also bring change to plus or minus 100%.

   

   To explain the above with very strange words never used for numbers in order to get the attention it deserves. NET SALES TOTALS & Cash Reciepts OF ALL WORLD PATENTED GRIDS HAVE A FREE WILL.  Hopefully you will accept the statement to use the Grid in many ways that the SEC should pursue. Over the years I have tried to convey all of the above from daily postings and charts within my prior web addresses & postings. 

 

Lastly & again per the Patent there are “No Wrong OiBiTDA* results, only real-time answers as to how and why Quarterly Corporate results change from prior SEC submissions.”   All the data are relative to Benchmarks 1,2, & 3 in comparison to the prior quarter, referred to as parameters after a full quarter of use.

  

   Here in as a retired CPA Corporate Controller of a very former Fortune 500 Corporation I am not looking for specific market help for the All World Grid and its Quotient. Both should be in SEC hands through partial or as a whole. 

 

PS: A 2nd Quotient Probable can be used for Cash Receipts ONLY with OiBiTDA being the weekly change to a Check Book that will revolutionize Accountability for Government Agencies &  Local Bank Operations.

 

   Although all of the above orignated in a manufacturing plant. Retail Giants can expose the mix of each Major Product Line from all the personnel in each Facility (specified in the Patent) as never available before.  Ditto for all products from each plant.      

   

  As a Bank of America Shareholder I tried to retain Merrill Lynch as my investment Banker. To no avail when offering 51% of Equity to BAC. No one wants to do the arithmetic in person.

 

Such 51% to a Worthy Inovator with 20% to the SEC is still an option. 

 

THE PATENT ITSELF